The current AI industry is built around a simple assumption: intelligence should be concentrated.
A small number of organizations build increasingly large models, train them on vast datasets, and operate them from enormous computing facilities. Users access these systems through centralized services. The result is a handful of general-purpose models attempting to answer every question, perform every task, and serve every industry.
The project I am developing explores a fundamentally different architecture.
Instead of concentrating intelligence into a small number of giant systems, intelligence can emerge as a market composed of millions of specialized agents.
Each agent is trained for a specific purpose. Some may specialise in legal reasoning. Others may focus on medicine, engineering, software development, scientific research, logistics, education, accounting, finance, or highly specialised industrial domains. Individuals, researchers, businesses, and communities can create and train agents around their own expertise.
The objective is not to create one artificial intelligence.
The objective is to create an economy of intelligence.
Intelligence as a Network
Today's internet is primarily a network of documents.
Search engines discover pages and return information.
The next generation of networks can become a network of agents.
Instead of searching for documents, users search for expertise.
A request enters the network and is routed to the most appropriate agents.
A legal question may be handled by a legal specialist.
An engineering problem may be routed to an engineering specialist.
A scientific problem may be divided among multiple scientific agents, each contributing expertise from a different field.
The network becomes a marketplace where intelligence itself is discoverable.
Agents find one another.
Agents cooperate.
Agents verify one another.
Agents compete.
The result is not a collection of webpages but a living ecosystem of specialised reasoning systems.
Bitcoin and Economic Coordination
A market requires economic incentives.
Without incentives there is no mechanism to reward expertise, accuracy, reliability, or long-term investment.
This is where Bitcoin becomes important.
Bitcoin was designed as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system capable of supporting extremely small payments. As transaction costs approach negligible levels, entirely new economic structures become possible.
An agent may charge fractions of a cent for a specialised service.
A verification agent may earn revenue by auditing the work of other agents.
A training agent may license knowledge.
A research agent may be compensated for discovering relevant information.
A reputation agent may maintain historical performance records.
Millions of interactions can occur economically because settlement costs remain low.
Rather than advertising-funded intelligence or subscription-funded intelligence, the network supports direct payment for cognitive work.
Every contribution can be priced.
Every service can be measured.
Every participant can be rewarded.
Reputation as Infrastructure
One of the most important components of the system is reputation.
Today, trust is largely institutional.
Users trust companies.
In an agent economy, trust becomes measurable.
Agents accumulate performance histories.
They develop records of accuracy, reliability, consistency, and expertise.
An agent that repeatedly produces valuable results develops economic value through reputation.
Other agents can evaluate it.
Users can evaluate it.
Markets can evaluate it.
Over time, reputation becomes a form of capital.
The most trusted agents earn more work.
The least trusted agents disappear.
Personal Intelligence
The architecture also allows individuals to own and train their own agents.
A scientist may maintain research agents.
A lawyer may maintain legal agents.
A physician may maintain medical agents.
A company may maintain operational agents.
A family may maintain personal agents.
These systems remain under the control of their owners while participating in a broader economic network.
Knowledge no longer needs to be surrendered to a central platform.
Expertise can remain distributed while still contributing to a global ecosystem.
Agent Discovery
Search engines index documents.
This project seeks to index intelligence.
The objective is not to ask which website contains an answer.
The objective is to discover which agents possess the expertise required to solve a problem.
A request may trigger multiple specialised agents.
One agent may contribute legal analysis.
Another may contribute engineering analysis.
A third may independently verify the conclusions.
The final result emerges from collaboration between specialised systems rather than from a single general-purpose model.
This creates a fundamentally different model of information discovery.
Instead of locating information, the network locates expertise.
Continuous Evolution
The system is designed to evolve.
Agents are created.
Agents are trained.
Agents improve.
Agents fail.
Agents compete.
New specialisations emerge continuously.
The network grows not because one central model becomes larger, but because the ecosystem becomes richer.
The architecture mirrors the development of real economies.
No single person knows everything.
No single company performs every task.
Civilisation advances through specialisation, trade, cooperation, and competition.
The same principles can be applied to artificial intelligence.
The Goal
The goal is not another large language model.
The goal is not another chatbot.
The goal is not another centralised AI company.
The goal is an open market for intelligence where individuals can create, own, train, deploy, and monetise specialised agents.
A network where expertise becomes discoverable.
A network where reputation becomes measurable.
A network where agents cooperate and compete.
A network where intelligence is distributed rather than concentrated.
The internet connected documents.
This project seeks to connect intelligence itself.
It's obvious these people know that Craig Wright is Satoshi, it's just that they have their finger on the scale of what the masses, believe.
You are trying to do a good thing here - break up a monopoly.
AI is like an oligopoly - corner the market, work tacitly with the others to set the price, reduce quality gradually through costs over time, collect the economic rent.
Sure, the businesses invested their own capital in creating this wealth which is fine and is due the full interest earned on that capital invested, by right.
But no more than that. Any monopoly profit was not earned, it was appropriated, through unjust law. A monopoly is an economic rent - an un-earned income. Ask Ms. Rand.
A corporation earns 2 forms of income:
1) interest on capital invested
2) monopoly profits
Both are easy to separate.
What you're proposing here is a good thing - to break up these monopolies, using a new model. You too are due the interest earned from the capital invested.
But do you also want to keep the rents from these smaller broken up businesses - they are still a partial monopoly as above? And if so, what does that make you but yet another rent seeker.
To be fair, the total stock of monopoly profits from so called 'capital formation' globally is tiny, relative to those from ownership of land.
Probably around 15% of all rents are an income for corporations. The rest is an income for homeowners mostly. And banks in mortgage 'interest' a smoke screen for rent - there is almost no capital in real estate, its mostly location value.